We are a newly formed civil society coalition who appeal to the State Government to take steps to ensure that promises made in regards to sustainable development be fulfilled through implementation of existing laws and procedures.

Sabah is an area of significant cultural heritage and biodiversity and and we must ensure that future generations are still able to benefit from this and not have to deal with environmental disasters we leave them.

We are a speaking up on behalf of Sabah, its people and future generations in the hope of obtaining Development Justice. We have named our coalition GUAS which translates to the word tree in Kadazandusun or the main trunk of the tree.

We welcome other groups to join us. Currently GUAS comprises of the following members:

  • Greenfriends
  • Himpunan Hijau
  • Jaringan Orang Asal SeMalaysia – JOAS
  • PACOS Trust
  • Sabah Environmental Protection Association – SEPA
  • Sabah Women’s Action Group – SAWO
  • Save Open Space Kota Kinabalu – SOS KK

 

Today, we would like to highlight the following issues :

  1. Examples of ongoing failures in existing environmental safeguards:
    • The proposed Kaiduan Dam without the consent or agreement by local community. No documentation has been provided to objectively demonstrate whether or not the dam is essential in order to provide future piped water supplies for western Sabah. No concrete documents or studies have been forwarded by the responsible agencies to the community or NGOs.
    • The destruction for a PEMANDU & SEDIA aquaculture project of healthy mangrove forest in Pitas, and Kudat. These mangroves areas have been utilised by local communities for their source of protein and livelihood., In Pitas land was cleared prior to the approval of the EIA (2,300 acres according to the EIA submitted). A similar situation is seen in Kudat. Both projects began before the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was approved. And there are reports of ongoing clearing outside the companies designated areas in Pitas and continued clearing in Kudat, even though the company has been compounded by the relevant government agencies.  This matter has been reported to the agencies by the communities and NGOs and is still being investigated.
    • The degazettement of a Class I Forest Reserve in 2013 to make way for a proposed gold mining project close to Tawau Hill Park, and surrounded by Class I Forest Reserve. The Terms of Reference (ToR) for this proposal have been rejected twice at the Panel review meetings chaired by  Environmental Protection Department.  A third ToR is going to be tabled at a Panel meeting on Wednesday, July 1st. Why was Forest Reserve degazetted for a proposal that lacked an EIA? With Mamut Copper Mine a lasting environmental disaster, does Sabah necessarily want another copper mine??

 

 

  1. The 11th Malaysian Plan 2016-2020 (11MP) was revealed by the Prime Minister in May 2015 as being pro-growth, pro-people, pro-business, environment friendly and emphasis on nation building. We applaud this statement – we are all for environmentally friendly projects but fixing environments after they are exploited and damaged is not only a costly exercise but a long process.  We should instead focus on protecting the environment we have now and focusing on sustainable development in areas that are not environmentally sensitive and/or  designated as a cultural heritage.

 

National and State environmental laws, regulations and procedures are in place. Why are we not using them?

 

More and more we see the rule of law being disregarded by companies, why does this issue keep repeating itself? Compunding these companies do not seem to be acting as a deterrent.

 

We also note there is a lack of specific initiatives for Orang Asal communities in Peninsular and East Malaysia, this would hurt the 11MP’s aim of lifting the incomes of the Bottom 40% (B40) of households.

 

According to Assoc Prof Dr Madeline Berma, an economist with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia as quoted in the media, this is because a majority of Orang Asal communities in the Peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak are at the bottom of the B40.

 

The Federal government has approval from Parliament to spend RM260 billion on the 11MP which is the government’s final push to bring Malaysia to high-income nation status.

 

One third of the 11MP is focused on inclusive growth, including raising the incomes of the B40, reducing costs of living, supporting the disabled and building rural infrastructure.

 

Thank you.

 

For further information, please contact us at: guas.sabah@gmail.com

 

At - Copy

Sin Chew

DE - Copy

 

OCDN - Copy

See Hua

 

SEPA (Sabah Environmental Protection Association) is registered under Registar of Society Malaysia (ROS), the proceedings of this Association strictly adhere to its constitution.

NO ONE can represent SEPA in any external dealings with our stakeholders unless they have a written permit by the President of SEPA and the Executive Committee.
Any such person wrongfully misrepresenting SEPA will be dealt with in a manner befitting this offence.
Any Ordinary Member/Life Member acting on behalf of SEPA without going through due procedure will be struck of the Membership List and action will be taken.
Please contact SEPA at info@sepa.my for any clarification.

Dear members,

Notice is hereby given to all members that the ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of SABAH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOSIATION will be held on

 

DATE:        21st March  2015 ( Saturday )

TIME:        2.00pm

VENUE:     Karamunsing Ballroom, karamunsing Kompleks

 

The AGM minutes of 2013 can be downloaded here.

Download:

SEPA AGM 2014 minutes 

 

Thank you.

Regards

Julia Hwong

SEPA Secretary

KOTA KINABALU: The move by the Environment Protection Department (EPD) in Sabah to unilaterally approve a massive aquaculture project is worrying seven non-governmental organisations here.

The NGOs want greater transparency and public participation in the evaluation of Envi­ronmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports as all projects ultimately affect the people.

They were responding to the EPD director’s recent statement that he was not obliged to refer any matters back to the EIA Review Panel before a final decision is made in approving an EIA.

Datuk Yabi Yangkat had cited Section 12D(1) of the Environment Protection Enactment 2002, which stipulates that the EPD director was empowered to approve an EIA report even if no Review Panel meeting was held.

The NGOs – Sabah Environmental Protection Association (Sepa), Land Empowerment Animals People (LEAP), Indigenous Peoples Network of Malaysia (Joas), Borneo Rhino Alliance (Bora), Sabah Environmental Trust (SET), Save Open Spaces Kota Kinabalu (SOS KK) and Himpunan Hijau – believe EPD is moving backwards by interpreting the law so narrowly.

Sepa president Lanash Thanda said the role of the Review Panel could be considered obsolete, and the concept of public participation undermined.

“The recent statement means that NGO participation in the process is nothing more than a rubber stamping exercise.

“This is a breakdown of social and environmental safeguards as it allows for one authority to approve future EIAs without consultation,” Lanash said.

On Dec 19, EPD approved the EIA for a RM1.23bil shrimp aquaculture project in Pitas, despite an earlier rejection by the Review Panel that included SEPA and WWF-Malaysia.

The department also did not notify the panel members of its decision.

SET Chief Executive Officer Dr Rahimatsah Amat said the EPD’s Handbook on Environmental Impact Assessment in Sabah (2nd Edition) clearly mentions a public hearing and a review panel.

Rahimatsah, who claimed several activities had commenced in the last few years even while the Terms of Reference (TOR) were being discussed, added that this was a breach of section 7(1) of the Environmental Protection (Prescribed Activities) (EIA) Order 2005.

The seven are now seeking an appointment with the State Tourism, Culture and Environ­ment Ministry, under which EPD falls, to discuss procedures and issues related to the EIA process.

The group is also contemplating a public forum to create awareness on environmental issues and the EIA process.

“We are here to ensure that public interest is respected and protected.

“We do not have any other agenda,” Rahimatsah said.

 

Source: http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2015/02/22/NGOs-question-EPD-approval-Groups-want-greater-transparency-in-EIA-evaluation-of-Sabah-aquaculture-p/

Calls for more transparency on KB housing project

By Ezra Haganez
KOTA BELUD : A local activist has called on the authorities to explain if the proposed development of 2,000-unit public flat at Kg Pirasan near here has an approved EIA or Environment Impact Assesment, as earth-works started weeks ago.
Kanul Gindol, a political and human right activist, said he has been approached by concerned locals of what is going on at the site which happened to be close to the pristine Kadamaian River.

“As a concerned local citizen and in a position to observe, i am issuing this statement upon requests by my environment-concerned friends on the government’s proposed development of a 900-unit “peoples flat” near here.

“We believed this 900 units are part of the proposed 2,000 units Rumah Rakyat to be built here as announced by the Federal Government earlier last year,” Kanul said in a statement here today.
Kanul who is also chairman of Kelawat New Township Planning and Development Committee, said earth-moving and hill cuttings have started at the proposed site in Pirasan but many are asking if a transparent EIA has been approved for such development.
“Villagers in the vicinity also have raised concerned of future floodings if proper drainage are not to be thoroughly planned and carried out as had happenned in many incidences in Malaysia, particularly in Sabah.
“There are even claims that a “public consultation” with those affected in the vicinity had failed to be carried out. We call on the authorities to explain this so as to quash unnecessary rumours on the much-needed housing project,” he pointed out.
Kanul said everyone had welcomed development, more so for affordable houses like this one in Kota Belud. However, he said, stringent regulations must be followed.
“We wanted to believe that the Government especially the Federal Urban Wellbeing, Housing and Local Government Ministry as well as the Kota Belud local authority would have looked into all the requirements so as not to burden the peoples and the state later.
“We call to attention the prevalent floods as soon as construction sites appeared in the vicinity. We are talking of preventing floods, and not managing them only later, which is a bad planning,” he further said.
The activist also claimed that many in Kota Belud are also very concerned by few other on-going projects here where good planning seemed not to have been put in place before carrying out these projects.
“One glaring example is the unnecessary tiling of pedestrian pavement that was put around the Kota Belud town recently. Why was the tiles on these pavements suddenly ordered to be taken out last week and replaced with another similar tiles?
“Isn’t it a waste of public fund? Another example is the upgrading of the town’s Padang, where initially they have put up fence at the wrong perimeter. The contractor was forced to realign the fencing for the site which would have not been the case if there were good planning,” he said.
“Some may claim that these issues are small things, but how could one trust someone or the authorities for bigger things when even in small things they failed?,” Kanul said.
Source:http://www.borneoherald.com/2015/02/calls-for-more-transparency-on-kb.html

Alienation of 650 acres in Lahad Datu to Felda void  rules court Villagers rightful land owners   Daily Express Newspaper Online  Sabah  Malaysia.

 

KOTA KINABALU: The High Court here has declared that the alienation of 650 acres at Tanjung Labian in Tungku, Lahad Datu to the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) is unconstitutional and therefore null and void.

Judicial Commissioner Datuk Douglas Primus, in his judgement on Friday, ordered Felda to pay damages to the villagers who were the successful applicants to the 650 acres.

Douglas declared that the Director of Lands and Surveys and the State Government of Sabah had acted unconstitutionally contrary to Articles 8 and 13 of the Federal Constitution in alienating to Felda the 650 acres which had been approved to the villagers in 1972.

He ruled that in alienating the land to Felda, the Director of Lands and Surveys had acted unlawfully.

On the issue of failing to enforce the agreement entered into by the State Government of Sabah and Felda to compensate the applicants by negotiation to purchase the land approved to the villagers, Douglas declared that the State Government of Sabah was in breach of fiduciary duty in failing to protect and safeguard the proprietary interest of the villagers in the land.

Felda, as a plaintiff, initiated the suit in 2011, applying to the High Court to evict the villagers from part of the land alienated to it, alleging trespassing by the villagers. The suit encompassed about 5,000 villagers from Tanjung Labian, Lok Buani, Tg Batu, Sungai Bilis and Tanagian.

The villagers in their defence denied trespassing and claimed native customary rights to the land and that part of the land was alienated to some of the villagers by the Department of Lands and Surveys following the approval of the State Government of Sabah in 1972.

The villagers as defendants also counter claimed against Felda, the Registrar of Titles, Assistant Collector of Land Revenues of Lahad Datu, the Director of Sabah Lands and Surveys and the State Government of Sabah seeking relief, including declarations and damages.

According to one of the four sued defendants, Asrafal Alin, a representative of the villagers, sometime in 1970, the native communities led by his late father KK Alian Bin Som had applied for three plots of land at Tanjung Labian.

In 1972, following the approval of the State Government, the Director of Lands and Surveys Sabah alienated and surveyed 650 acres to the applicants.

“However, the Department of Lands and Surveys did not proceed to issue the land titles to the successful applicants despite the lapse of time.

“Sometime in 1979, the State Government of Sabah had agreed to allow a Federal Government agency, Federal Land Development Authority or known as Felda to develop more than 200,000 acres including the land located in Lahad Datu at Tanjung Labian,” Asrafal said.

“Sometime in 1982 or 1983, Felda entered the land to carry out site clearing and oil palm planting activities and planted oil palm in the land alienated to the villagers at the location now known as Sahabat 22,” said Asrafal.

“I am very grateful for the decision of the High Court. It has been very demoralising and humiliating to me and my family, especially to the villagers who are the children of the applicants, that as the rightful owners and successors of the land, we were subject to such eviction proceedings by Felda.

“Worst still, my fellow villagers who were under employment in Felda were sacked by Felda because of their commitment to defend the land. We are also grateful to our lawyer Datuk Kong Hong Ming who has helped to defend the case against us on a pro bono basis,” said Asrafal.

Douglas, in his judgement, found that no evidence was adduced to show that the letters of offer were withdrawn or cancelled, and consequently, the letters of offer are valid and binding. He also found that the relevant authorities had acknowledged and accepted the proprietary interest of the applicants in the land.

Consequently, the contention that the applicants were in breach of the terms of the letters of offer had been waived and overtaken by events for the reason that Felda and the Sabah State Government had agreed to compensate the applicants by private treaty to purchase the said land. As a result, estoppel set in to bind the parties.

Douglas said that even until today, Felda has yet to negotiate with a view to purchase the said land from the successful applicants.

As to the saguhati (consolation) payment of RM32,500 allegedly paid by Felda, Douglas found that the evidence adduced was only an internal accounting statement which could not be proof that payment was made to every applicant. In any event, compensation must be paid to the applicants by negotiation to purchase the said land. Such saguhati payment did not have any legal consequence and did not amount to any compensation.

As to the other issues for determination, Douglas ruled that the applicants’ claim was not barred by the Limitation Ordinance or the Land Acquisition Ordinance and damages shall be assessed at the date of the judgement.

Felda as the plaintiff was represented by counsel Gani Zaleka, the defendants were represented by Datuk Kong Hong Ming, the Director of Lands and Surveys and State Government of Sabah by State counsel Mohammad Abdul Sani.

Caption: Some of the villagers outside the courtroom.

Source: http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID=97261

Dear Members,

Notice is hereby given to all members that the ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of SABAH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOSIATION will be held on Saturday, the 21st of March, 2015 at 2pm, Karamunsing Ballroom, 88300, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah to conduct the following businesses:

 

AGENDA:

  1. President to call the meeting.
  2. To confirm minutes of the AGM 2014.
  3. To confirm the amendments of Constitution.
  4. Report by the Secretary, activities and the success stories during the year 2014.
  5. Presentation of the account and the financial report by the Treasurer (2014).
  6. Motions for adoption (If any).
  7. Appointment of the Election Chairperson and election of the Office Bearers for Term 2015-2017.
  8. General Election.
  9. Incoming President Speech.
  10. Appointment of the Auditors and Trustee.

 

Please note:

  1. All nominations for the election of office bearers for 2015-2017 and motion (if any) shall be emailed to the Secretary at info@sepa.my before 4pm, on the 25th February 2015 or contact the above numbers. The nomination form can be downloaded here.
  2. Only members with updated memberships of the society are eligible to attend and participate in the meeting according to the laws of the society. No proxy attendance or voting will be allowed.

 

Download:

Nomination Election Form

 

Julia Hwong
Secretary
SABAH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ASSOCIATION

PRESS RELEASE: Destruction of Mangroves Continues in Pitas With Disregard for Sabah’s Laws

Kota Kinabalu, 11th January 2015: Sabah’s environmental laws which were put into place to safeguard the environment is being blatantly disregarded by the project proponents of the Pitas Shrimp Park which is also known as the Pitas Aquaculture Project. The project is a joint venture between Inno Fisheries Sdn Bhd which is under the Sabah Foundation and Sunlight Seafood (Sabah) Sdn Bhd.

“Environmental laws have been put into place as safeguards for the benefit and protection of all our futures and breaking these laws should be as serious as any other crime and not as something that can be ignored,” said Sabah Environmental Protection Association (SEPA) President Lanash Thanda.

According to the SEPA President the law is clear, they should be no development activities until the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is approved.

“As far as we are aware, this project has not had its EIA approved, is the project proponent above the law? This situation raises alarming questions with regards to other development projects. Does this mean that projects that are government linked do not have to follow the law? What has happened in this situation makes a mockery of the hard work and legal procedures that have been put in place for Sabah. Does this now mean that the people of Sabah cannot rely on the EIA system to safeguard the environment?” asked the SEPA President.

It has been reported that the project proponents were clearing land as early as April 2013 with commencement of earthworks for shrimp ponds but the first step of an EIA which is the Terms of Reference was only approved by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) in July 2013.

In January 2014, the project received EPD approval for only the development of infrastructure such as putting in water pipes and electricity in consideration for the needs for the local community however electricity has been available in the area since 1997, meanwhile the illegal work on the shrimp ponds still continued.

In addition, as the area is classified as mangrove swamp, a riparian zone of 100 meters must be maintained, however upon inspection of areas that have been cleared SEPA found that they were no riparian buffers.

This project was identified under the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) and Sabah Economic Development & Investment Authority (SEDIA) and began clearing mangrove areas months before the EIA review meeting was even held in June 2014. It was understood at the time of the review the project’s EIA, it was rejected due to serious environmental issues that had not been addressed adequately in the EIA.

“This project has been developed unsustainably from the beginning. A state authority such as the Sabah Foundation should have acted in a responsible and accountable manner. It could even be argued that this whole “project” is illegal from the start for not complying with the State Laws,” summarised Lanash.

The Malaysian transformation agenda is built on a platform of sustainability and inclusiveness to ensure for long term sustainability. Certification is also a large component of this programme and due to the illegal manner which this project has been carried out, no internationally recognised certification scheme will certify this project.

“Mangroves are crucial to our fisheries industry, wildlife and local community who rely on the sources of income derived from the natural resources available. You cannot rebuild a destroyed ecosystem such as this. And this project is 39 times the size of the Kota Kinabalu Wetlands, so it is a sizeable area that has been destroyed to do an aquaculture project,” stated Lanash.

In addition, it is understood that shrimp aquaculture had a long history of devastating outbreaks of diseases throughout the nation including in Sabah since the 1990s.

SEPA also provided photographs taken as recently as August 2014 showing the continued clearing and destruction of the mangrove system against the wishes of some of the community of the area.

“This destruction must stop immediately and the project proponents must be answerable to laws of this State and remedial efforts be carried out immediately by them at their own cost,” concluded Lanash.

 

The pristine mangroves found in Pitas cannot be rebuilt once it is destroyed. How much more can we afford to lose?

The pristine mangroves found in Pitas cannot be rebuilt once it is destroyed. How much more can we afford to lose?

10915332_821688031221055_2570112644614710596_n10403355_821688047887720_8031897396856869959_n